Caring. Effective. Efficient.

Client Win: CAVC No. 20-2665, Johns v. McDonough (BVA wrong to deny earlier PTSD effective date)

Client Win: CAVC No. 20-2665, Johns v. McDonough (BVA wrong to deny earlier PTSD effective date)

This case involves a Marine Corps veteran (1966 to 1969) who was seeking an earlier effective date for his service connected PTSD claim. The appeal was resolved through a joint motion to remand.

ISSUE ON APPEAL TO THE CAVC (BVA wrong to deny earlier PTSD effective date).

The general PTSD effective date rule is that your award is effective the later of the date of the claim and the date the entitlement arose. 38 C.F.R. §3.400. However, there are a lot of exceptions that allow for an earlier PTSD effective date.

One of those exceptions is based on the discover of new and relevant service records. If at any time after the VA issues a decision on a claim, the VA receives or associates with the claims file new and relevant service records that were not in the file when the VA first decided the claim, the VA must reconsider that claim. 38 C.F.R. §3.156(c). 

RESOLUTION AT THE CAVC.

The veteran appealed the BVA's denial of a PTSD effective date earlier than December 2012. The BVA found that a 1971 rating decision denying entitlement to service connection for PTSD was final, and that the 1971 claim date could not serve as the PTSD effective date. 

However, it was only after additional service records were added to the record that the veteran was granted service connection for PTSD. The BVA did not consider whether 38 C.F.R. §3.156(c) applied; it failed to consider whether the PTSD effective date could be the date underlying the 1971 rating decision based on the addition of new and relevant service records to the file.

The parties agreed that the BVA erred, and that remand to the BVA was proper, because the BVA incorrectly applied the law. Tucker v. West, 11 Vet.App. 369, 374 (1998).

If you believe you are entitled to a PTSD effective date earlier than the one the BVA or VA assigned, and would like legal representation by an accredited VA attorney to appeal the decision to the BVA or the CAVC, click here to have  Attig | Curran | Steel take a look at your case.

Case Details

OGC Attorney: Jacqueline Kerin (link to attorney's bio on LinkedIn)

Veteran Representation at CAVC: Alexandra Curran (link to bio)

Board of Veterans Appeals Veterans Law Judge:  J. Parker (link to bio on Campbell University website)

Attorney for the BVA: D. Constantino

Vets’ Rep at BVA: Carol Ponton (link to attorney's cases with our firm)

Date of BVA Decision: December 19, 2019

Date of CAVC Joint Motion to Remand: December 16, 2020   

Link to BVA Decision

Link to CAVC Joint Motion to Remand

Recent Cases

This case involves an Army veteran who served on active duty in 1991 and then from 2008 to 2009 who was seeking a service-connected major depressive disorder rating in excess of 30%. The appeal was resolved through a joint motion to remand. ISSUE ON… Read More
This case involves a survivor’s claim for entitlement to Dependency and Indemnity Compensation (DIC). The appellant’s late-husband served in the US Air Force from 1964 – 1984, and passed away from a rare form of non-Hodgkins lymphom… Read More
This case involved a US Army veteran (1967 to 1971) who was seeking service connection for hypertension, congestive heart failure, Type II diabetes, stroke, and atrial fibrillation due to agent orange exposure in Thailand during the Vietnam war. The… Read More

See More Appellate Results

Taking Point! Blog

Mar
2
In January 2021, the loss of use of a reproductive organ for SMC purposes was the focus of a panel of judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals Veterans Claims issued a precedential opinion in Bria v. Wilkie.   The panel consisted of Judge Mere… Read More
Feb
26
In January 2021, the VA rating for prostate cancer was the focus of a panel of judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals Veterans Claims issued a precedential opinion in Bailey v. Wilkie.   The panel consisted of Chief Judge Bartley (who… Read More
Feb
26
  Bold and unapologetically honest, Pam Keith is a refreshing political voice you need to follow right now.  She smoothly articulates the most rocky and controversial topics of our time.  It is no surprise that this attorney with 25 years of expe… Read More
Feb
12
In November 2020, a panel of judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals Veterans Claims issued a precedential opinion in Holmes v. Wilkie.   In it, the Court laid out a road map for Veterans trying to get the correct VA rating for migraines… Read More

Read the "Taking Point!" Blog