Caring. Effective. Efficient.

Federal Circuit Court of Appeals

The U.S. Federal Circuit Court of Appeals is the first, and only, Article III court that most veterans will ever see in their benefits claims or appeals.

Even then, the vast majority of veterans who appeal an adverse decision of the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) to the U.S. Federal Circuit Court of Appeals will lose.

The Federal Circuit has such narrow jurisdiction over CAVC judgments that a good bit of time and thought must go into preparation for an appeal to the Federal Circuit.

Federal Circuit Court of Appeals Require Unique Skill.

As appellate professionals, the attorneys at Attig | Curran | Steel work hard, before filing any appeals to the Federal Circuit, to ensure that your client’s appeal is one over which the court most commonly has jurisdiction:

  1. Erroneous "Rule of Law" interpretation
  2. Statutory or regulatory interpretation issues
  3. Legal questions regarding the jurisdiction of the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
  4. Jurisdiction over constitutional issues

We closely examine the record to ensure that we will not make an argument that is clearly outside the jurisdiction of the court:

  1. Disputes over the facts of the case
  2. Disputes regarding the Veterans Court's application of law to fact
  3. Factual or factual application disputes masquerading as statutory, regulatory or constitutional issues.

Once we are sure we can develop a strong argument in support of the court’s exercise of jurisdiction, we work through an extensive case analysis and briefing process to focuses the court’s attention on the flashpoint of controversy in the case and the relief we are asking the court to grant.

Even after we have established that the Federal Circuit might have jurisdiction over a particular appeal, Attig | Curran | Steel is deliberate and calculating in deciding whether to take a particular case to the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals: because the precedential decisions of the Federal Circuit Court are impactful, hasty decisions to appeal, or poorly briefed appeals, often lead to bad precedent.

If you believe that your CAVC Memorandum or Panel decision was incorrectly decided, and would like us to evaluate the decision for appeal to the United States Federal Circuit Court of Appeals, please fill out our consultation request form, tell us about your case, and Attig | Curran | Steel will reach out to you.

Recent Cases

This case involves an Army veteran who served on active duty in 1991 and then from 2008 to 2009 who was seeking a service-connected major depressive disorder rating in excess of 30%. The appeal was resolved through a joint motion to remand. ISSUE ON… Read More
This case involves a survivor’s claim for entitlement to Dependency and Indemnity Compensation (DIC). The appellant’s late-husband served in the US Air Force from 1964 – 1984, and passed away from a rare form of non-Hodgkins lymphom… Read More
This case involved a US Army veteran (1967 to 1971) who was seeking service connection for hypertension, congestive heart failure, Type II diabetes, stroke, and atrial fibrillation due to agent orange exposure in Thailand during the Vietnam war. The… Read More

See More Appellate Results

Taking Point! Blog

Mar
2
In January 2021, the loss of use of a reproductive organ for SMC purposes was the focus of a panel of judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals Veterans Claims issued a precedential opinion in Bria v. Wilkie.   The panel consisted of Judge Mere… Read More
Feb
26
In January 2021, the VA rating for prostate cancer was the focus of a panel of judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals Veterans Claims issued a precedential opinion in Bailey v. Wilkie.   The panel consisted of Chief Judge Bartley (who… Read More
Feb
26
  Bold and unapologetically honest, Pam Keith is a refreshing political voice you need to follow right now.  She smoothly articulates the most rocky and controversial topics of our time.  It is no surprise that this attorney with 25 years of expe… Read More
Feb
12
In November 2020, a panel of judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals Veterans Claims issued a precedential opinion in Holmes v. Wilkie.   In it, the Court laid out a road map for Veterans trying to get the correct VA rating for migraines… Read More

Read the "Taking Point!" Blog