» 38 CFR 3.321(b)

Episode 003: CAVC Oral Argument: Spellers v. Wilkie, 16-4053 (April 19, 2018)

Issue for Oral Argument: General Overview of the Law When a veteran’s disability does not meet the requirements for the next higher schedular rating, but the evidence indicates his or her disability is more severe than the current rating, a veteran… Read More
April 23rd, 2018
Contributor: Chris ("Chrys") Attig
Read More
Categories: Veterans Law Updates
Tags: 2018 CAVC Oral Arguments, 38 CFR 3.321(b), Anthony D. Ortiz, CCK, Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, Dana N. Weiner, extra-schedular rating, podcast, Tessa S. Stillings

PRECEDENTIAL CAVC CASE ALERT: King v. Shulkin (16-2959)(Extra Schedular Rating)

What is the Deep Issue in the Case? Extra-schedular consideration should be considered “where the schedular evaluations are found to be inadequate.” 38 C.F.R. § 3.321(b)(1) (emphasis added). The herring loss rating criteria are largely b… Read More
December 22nd, 2017
Contributor: Chris ("Chrys") Attig
Read More
Categories: Veterans Law Updates
Tags: 38 CFR 3.321(b), Ashley D. Varga, CCK, Cleveland OH VARO, Demetrios G. Orfanoudis, extra-schedular rating, Judge Mary J. Schoelen, Judge Michael Allen, Judge William S. Greenberg, Linden K. Nash, panel, precedential, Thun