Caring. Effective. Efficient.

BVA errs in rating Central Sleep Apnea

BVA errs in rating Central Sleep Apnea

Th veteran sought a higher rating for several service-connected disabilities, including central sleep apnea (CSA), chronic bronchitis, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and allergic bronchospasms. The Board assigned a rating of 50% and no higher for all of the conditions combined.

In doing so, the BVA made three primary - and common - errors.

First, the BVA cannot invoke the rule in 38 C.F.R. §4.96a against the pyramiding of respiratory conditions unless all the conditions are respiratory in nature. Central Sleep Apnea, while it manifests in symptoms affecting the sleep breathing functions of the body, is not a respiratory condition. It is a neurological condition, and therefore in the opinion of this firm, is not subject to the rule against pyramiding ratings of respiratory conditions under 38 C.F.R. §4.96a.  

Second, if the BVA is going to invoke the rule in 38 CFR 4.96a against the pyramiding of respiratory conditions, it must explain which of the respiratory conditions predominates, and use that as a basis. 

Third, in any case where a veteran has sought an increased rating, and there are symptoms of a condition not envisioned by the schedular disability compensation ratings tables, the BVA has a duty to consider whether an extra-schedular rating is appropriate

The BVA denied this veteran separate ratings for Sleep Apnea and COPD. 

On remand, the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims made it clear the BVA failed to explain which of the 2 conditions was predominant for rating purposes. Because the veteran's central sleep apnea is a neurologic condition, the BVA also failed to consider what diagnostic code should be assigned to rate his sleep apnea.

Does this case sound like your VA Rating Decision or BVA Decision? If so, click here to have  Attig | Steel take a look at your case.

Link to the BVA Decision on CAVC Website.

Link to the Joint Motion to Remand the CAVC Website.

Case Details

OGC Attorney: Abigail J. Schopick

Veteran Representation at CAVC: Chris Attig (link to bio)

Board of Veterans Appeals Veterans Law Judge: Deborah W. Singleton

Regional Office: Boise, Idaho

Vets’ Rep at BVA: American Legion 

Date of BVA Decision: January 29, 2016

Date of CAVC Judgment on Remand

Taking Point! Blog

Oct
26
If you are an agent, VSO, or attorney, you have a tough decision under AMA when the BVA issues a denial of your client’s benefits. On one hand, you can file a supplemental claim. On the other, you can file an appeal to the US Court of Ap… Read More
Jun
3
I really can’t take it anymore. I’m sure many like you feel the same way. Every time another child with a military weapon ambushes a school full of children, I am overwhelmed with emotions that have no outlet. I can’t even process… Read More
May
27
  While on our way to the nutcracker audition at the local theatre I asked my 9-year-old daughter how her day went at school. “It was okay.  We had another active shooter drill.  When the drill started, I had to run behind and under my teacher… Read More
May
23
After years of exploring different fields, I’ve found purpose-driven work here, at Attig | Curran | Steel.   There are a lot of variables in the experience of “happy.” It is difficult to keep it continuous.  Do I feel happy when my kids… Read More

Read the "Taking Point!" Blog

Recent Cases

This case involves the BVA judge’s inadequate reasoning of a denial of a veteran’s claim for an increased rating for PTSD.   The appeal was resolved through a joint motion to remand. ISSUE ON APPEAL TO THE CAVC (BVA overlooked evidence… Read More
This case involves the BVA judge’s inadequate reasoning of his denial of a veteran’s past-due benefits in a claim for an increased rating due to an increase in the severity of the veteran’s PTSD. The appeal was resolved through a jo… Read More
This case involves the BVA’s failure to comply with a Veterans Court Order in a January 2020 Memorandum Decision. The appeal was resolved through a joint motion to remand. ISSUE ON APPEAL TO THE CAVC (BVA fails to comply with Veterans Court Ord… Read More

See More Appellate Results