Caring. Effective. Efficient.

BVA Duty to Assist in Obtaining Medical Records

BVA Duty to Assist in Obtaining Medical Records

 

This case involves the BVA duty to assist in the context of a surviving spouse's accrued benefits and DIC claims and appeals. 

A veteran or other claimant has a right to substantial compliance with a CAVC or BVA remand order.  Stegall v. West, 11 Vet.App. 268, 271 (1998). 

The VA has a duty to assist a veteran in obtaining evidence to support their claim or appeal. 38 U.S.C. §5103A(a)(1).

After a July 2013 joint motion to remand at the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, the CAVC ordered the VA to comply with its duty to assist the veteran in obtaining the now-deceased veteran's records from the Philadelphia Naval Hospital, which was closed some time ago.

In May 2014, the BVA remanded the case with a similar order to the VA, requiring it to obtain all outstanding treatment records and reports from PNH for the period from January 1945 to December 1954.  Significantly, the BVA ordered the Secretary to continue these efforts until the VA Regional Office determined  the records  do not exist or that further efforts to obtain them would be futile.

The VA Regional Office sent one letter to the Philadelphia Naval Hospital requesting the records.

But because the Philadelphia Naval Hospital was closed, the letter was returned to sender.

The VA Regional Office believed that sending a letter to a medical facility it knew to be closed was sufficient to fulfill its duty to assist the veteran's surviving spouse. The VARO denied the claim, the BVA rubber-stamped it by stating that the VA fulfilled its duty to assist.

After a joint motion to remand, the CAVC vacated that decision on the grounds that the BVA failed to ensure compliance with both an order of the CAVC and the BVA's own error.  This error is a common error at the BVA and it is known as a "Stegall Error", for the case that stands for the proposition that a veteran is entitled to substantial compliance with a CAVC and/or BVA Remand order

Does this case sound like your VA Rating Decision or BVA Decision? If so, click here to have  Attig | Steel take a look at your case.

Link to the BVA Decision on CAVC Website.

Link to the Joint Motion to Remand the CAVC Website.

Case Details

OGC Attorney: Nathan P. Kirschner

Veteran Representation at CAVC: Chris Attig (link to bio)

Board of Veterans Appeals Veterans Law Judge: L. Howell

Regional Office: Newark, New Jersey, VA Regional Office

Vets’ Rep at BVA: George J. Singley, Attorney 

Date of BVA Decision: February 2, 2015

Date of CAVC Judgment on Remand: March 24, 2016

Recent Cases

This case involves an Army veteran who served on active duty in 1991 and then from 2008 to 2009 who was seeking a service-connected major depressive disorder rating in excess of 30%. The appeal was resolved through a joint motion to remand. ISSUE ON… Read More
This case involves a survivor’s claim for entitlement to Dependency and Indemnity Compensation (DIC). The appellant’s late-husband served in the US Air Force from 1964 – 1984, and passed away from a rare form of non-Hodgkins lymphom… Read More
This case involved a US Army veteran (1967 to 1971) who was seeking service connection for hypertension, congestive heart failure, Type II diabetes, stroke, and atrial fibrillation due to agent orange exposure in Thailand during the Vietnam war. The… Read More

See More Appellate Results

Taking Point! Blog

Mar
2
In January 2021, the loss of use of a reproductive organ for SMC purposes was the focus of a panel of judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals Veterans Claims issued a precedential opinion in Bria v. Wilkie.   The panel consisted of Judge Mere… Read More
Feb
26
In January 2021, the VA rating for prostate cancer was the focus of a panel of judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals Veterans Claims issued a precedential opinion in Bailey v. Wilkie.   The panel consisted of Chief Judge Bartley (who… Read More
Feb
26
  Bold and unapologetically honest, Pam Keith is a refreshing political voice you need to follow right now.  She smoothly articulates the most rocky and controversial topics of our time.  It is no surprise that this attorney with 25 years of expe… Read More
Feb
12
In November 2020, a panel of judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals Veterans Claims issued a precedential opinion in Holmes v. Wilkie.   In it, the Court laid out a road map for Veterans trying to get the correct VA rating for migraines… Read More

Read the "Taking Point!" Blog