Caring. Effective. Efficient.

BVA wrongly denied survivor accrued benefits

BVA wrongly denied survivor accrued benefits

Attorney Chris Attig has been working with this veteran's survivor for half a decade to get her DIC and survivor's accrued benefits properly awarded. 

The veteran was a 3 decade military veteran, who fought not only in Thailand during the Vietnam War, but also fought in the first Gulf War. 

The problems first began with a VSO who advised the survivor that veterans who served in Thailand during the Vietnam War were not exposed to Agent Orange; based on this unmistakeably wrong "advice", the survivor was denied DIC and accrued benefits. 

After retaining Attig | Steel to take over the battle from a VSO who did not know the current veterans law,  the VA continued to drag its heels and ignored the survivor's pleas for help, even as she lost her family home and nearly became homeless. 

Attig Steel had to file a petition for writ of mandamus to get the VA and BVA to act.

The BVA granted DIC - Dependency and Indemnity Compensation, or sometimes generally referred to as service connection of the cause of death. However, they continued to deny accrued benefits to the surviving spouse for her late husband's colon cancer, first present during military service.

The BVA also found that the now deceased veteran had withdrawn a claim for SMC (Special Monthly Compensation) based on his need for aid and attendance. The record showed that the VA misled the veteran into thinking he was receiving the benefit, and failed to follow the strict procedures under which a veteran might withdraw a case or claim.

The BVA decision denying survivor accrued benefits was remanded, as was the BVA decision that the veteran withdrew his claim for SMC based on Aid & Attendance.

The Attig | Steel firm is committed to working with this survivor to help her recover her accrued benefits on remand to the BVA and VA Regional Office.

UPDATE: This survivor was granted accrued benefits and SMC for a number of conditions with open and pending claims at the time of the veteran's death. Attig | Steel continues to work with the survivor to ensure that the VA provides the earliest possible effective date the record supports.  

Does this case sound like your VA Rating Decision or BVA Decision? If so, click here to have  Attig | Steel take a look at your case.

Link to the BVA Decision on CAVC Website.

Link to the Joint Motion to Remand the CAVC Website.

Case Details

OGC Attorney: Michael G. Imber

Veteran Representation at CAVC: Chris Attig (link to bio)

Board of Veterans Appeals Veterans Law Judge: S.B. Mays

Regional Office: Winston-Salem, North Carolina VARO

Vets’ Rep at BVA: Chris Attig (link to bio)

Date of BVA Decision: June 9, 2017

Date of CAVC Judgment on Remand: February 14, 2018

 

Taking Point! Blog

Oct
26
If you are an agent, VSO, or attorney, you have a tough decision under AMA when the BVA issues a denial of your client’s benefits. On one hand, you can file a supplemental claim. On the other, you can file an appeal to the US Court of Ap… Read More
Jun
3
I really can’t take it anymore. I’m sure many like you feel the same way. Every time another child with a military weapon ambushes a school full of children, I am overwhelmed with emotions that have no outlet. I can’t even process… Read More
May
27
  While on our way to the nutcracker audition at the local theatre I asked my 9-year-old daughter how her day went at school. “It was okay.  We had another active shooter drill.  When the drill started, I had to run behind and under my teacher… Read More
May
23
After years of exploring different fields, I’ve found purpose-driven work here, at Attig | Curran | Steel.   There are a lot of variables in the experience of “happy.” It is difficult to keep it continuous.  Do I feel happy when my kids… Read More

Read the "Taking Point!" Blog

Recent Cases

This case involves the BVA judge’s inadequate reasoning of a denial of a veteran’s claim for an increased rating for PTSD.   The appeal was resolved through a joint motion to remand. ISSUE ON APPEAL TO THE CAVC (BVA overlooked evidence… Read More
This case involves the BVA judge’s inadequate reasoning of his denial of a veteran’s past-due benefits in a claim for an increased rating due to an increase in the severity of the veteran’s PTSD. The appeal was resolved through a jo… Read More
This case involves the BVA’s failure to comply with a Veterans Court Order in a January 2020 Memorandum Decision. The appeal was resolved through a joint motion to remand. ISSUE ON APPEAL TO THE CAVC (BVA fails to comply with Veterans Court Ord… Read More

See More Appellate Results