Caring. Effective. Efficient.

5 Star Review: Service Connection of Depression for Veteran of Iraqi Freedom

5 Star Review: Service Connection of Depression for Veteran of Iraqi Freedom

The veteran in this case served in the Navy in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom, including deployment to Kuwait.

Upon his return stateside, after attempts to reintegrate to civilian life, he began to have family and other problems. He was diagnosed with multiple mental health conditions, including major depressive disorder, and the record was replete with evidence that most, if not all, of these conditions were associated with his military service. 

After 2 VA psychiatric C&P exams, however, the VA failed to acknowledge the major depression or discuss it's relationship to service. When the BVA issued its decision it, too, failed to discuss major depressive disorder.

Mr. Attig and his team conducted an extensive review of the record in this case - both the veteran's c-file from the VA Regional Office and the Record Before the Agency  at the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims.

He prepared a preliminary pre-brief memorandum to the VA Office of General Counsel who agreed that remand was the appropriate remedy for this particular veteran's BVA decision. 

The parties entered a Joint Motion to vacate and remand the case for a psychiatric exam addressing the veteran's major depressive disorder.

Attig | Steel coordinated with the law firm of Hill & Ponton to handle the veteran's remand to the BVA. 

Does this case sound like your VA Rating Decision or BVA Decision? If so, click here to have  Attig | Steel take a look at your case.

 

You can read Mr. Peregrino's review of Attig | Steel below. 

Link to the BVA Decision on CAVC Website.

Link to the Joint Motion to Remand the CAVC Website.

 

Review

Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims service connect depression iraqi freedom

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case Details

OGC Attorney: Lindsay Gower

Veteran Representation at CAVC: Chris Attig (link to bio)

Board of Veterans Appeals Veterans Law Judge: M.E. Larkin

Regional Office: Houston, Texas VARO

Vets’ Rep at BVA: Disabled American Veterans (DAV)

Date of BVA Decision: December 30, 2016

Date of CAVC Judgment on Reman: December 30, 2016

 

Taking Point! Blog

Jun
3
I really can’t take it anymore. I’m sure many like you feel the same way. Every time another child with a military weapon ambushes a school full of children, I am overwhelmed with emotions that have no outlet. I can’t even process… Read More
May
27
  While on our way to the nutcracker audition at the local theatre I asked my 9-year-old daughter how her day went at school. “It was okay.  We had another active shooter drill.  When the drill started, I had to run behind and under my teacher… Read More
May
23
After years of exploring different fields, I’ve found purpose-driven work here, at Attig | Curran | Steel.   There are a lot of variables in the experience of “happy.” It is difficult to keep it continuous.  Do I feel happy when my kids… Read More
May
18
When appellate courts review the decisions of lower courts – or in administrative law where a Court like the US Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) reviews the decisions of the BVA, an administrative tribunal – they use “… Read More

Read the "Taking Point!" Blog

Recent Cases

This case involves the BVA judge’s inadequate reasoning of a denial of a veteran’s claim for an increased rating for PTSD.   The appeal was resolved through a joint motion to remand. ISSUE ON APPEAL TO THE CAVC (BVA overlooked evidence… Read More
This case involves the BVA judge’s inadequate reasoning of his denial of a veteran’s past-due benefits in a claim for an increased rating due to an increase in the severity of the veteran’s PTSD. The appeal was resolved through a jo… Read More
This case involves the BVA’s failure to comply with a Veterans Court Order in a January 2020 Memorandum Decision. The appeal was resolved through a joint motion to remand. ISSUE ON APPEAL TO THE CAVC (BVA fails to comply with Veterans Court Ord… Read More

See More Appellate Results