Caring. Effective. Efficient.

Veterans Court: What constitutes loss of use of a reproductive organ for purposes of SMC?

In January 2021, the loss of use of a reproductive organ for SMC purposes was the focus of a panel of judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals Veterans Claims issued a precedential opinion in Bria v. Wilkie.
 
The panel consisted of Judge Meredith (who wrote the opinion for the Veterans Court), Judge Pietsch and Judge Greenberg.
 
The case involved the claim by a US Army veteran, service-connected for hepatitis-C, who sought entitlement to Special Monthly Compensation for the loss of his ability to use his reproductive organs. Specifically, he argued that wearing a condom to prevent the transmission of hepatitis-c constitutes a loss of use for SMC purposes.
 
The controlling law for entitlement to Special Monthly Compensation is found at  38 U.S.C. §1114(k) and 38 C.F.R. §3.350.
 
In its decision, the US Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims discussed what constitutes a loss or loss of use of a reproductive organ for the purposes of Special Monthly Compensation (SMC).
 
The Court found that the veteran failed to establish, as a matter of fact, that wearing a condom constitutes as a loss of use for SMC purposes.
 
However, the Court held open for another day the issue of whether wearing a condom to prevent the transmission of disease constitutes the anatomical loss or functional loss of use of reproductive organ(s).
 
In this video, attorney Chris Attig with the law firm of Attig | Curran | Steel, PLLC, discusses the Court's decision and what it means not just for veterans with a loss or diminishment of functioning of their reproductive organs, but for the attorneys, advocates, agents and VSOs who represent them.
 
If you believe you are entitled to Special Monthly Compensation (SMC) for loss or loss of use of a reproductive organ, or if the VA or BVA denied you - as a male or female veteran - SMC(k) for loss of use of a reproductive organ, request a consult at BVAappeals.com.

About the "Taking Point!" Blog

From veterans law, to attorney wellness, and elevating the voices of Black veterans, the law firm of Attig | Curran | Steel, PLLC, is Taking Point!

Taking Point! Blog

Oct
26
If you are an agent, VSO, or attorney, you have a tough decision under AMA when the BVA issues a denial of your client’s benefits. On one hand, you can file a supplemental claim. On the other, you can file an appeal to the US Court of Ap… Read More
Jun
3
I really can’t take it anymore. I’m sure many like you feel the same way. Every time another child with a military weapon ambushes a school full of children, I am overwhelmed with emotions that have no outlet. I can’t even process… Read More
May
18
When appellate courts review the decisions of lower courts – or in administrative law where a Court like the US Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) reviews the decisions of the BVA, an administrative tribunal – they use “… Read More
May
16
Let me tell you the story of two veterans. The first veteran – we’ll call him Jim – claimed he was exposed to herbicides – Agent Orange – outside of the Republic of Vietnam. After the VA spent decades denying his claim,… Read More

Read the "Taking Point!" Blog