Skip to main contentSkip to navigation
Attig Steel, PLLC

Attig Steel, PLLC
Menu
  • Home
  • Our Team
    • Chrys Attig
    • Jennifer Steel
    • Leslie D. Gaines
    • Jon C. Heiden
  • Our Services
    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Board of Veterans Appeals
    • Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
    • Federal Circuit Court of Appeals
  • Our Cases
  • Contact Us
Caring. Effective. Efficient.
Home › 38 C.F.R. §20.204

» 38 C.F.R. §20.204

Episode 010: "No, I won't give you my Debit Card PIN Number" (FCOA Precedent: Acree, #17-1749, Legal standard to withdraw an appeal orally at BVA)

What is the Deep Issue in the Case? VA regulations provide that a veteran’s “appeal may be withdrawn as to any or all issues involved in the appeal.” 38 C.F.R. § 20.204(a). a statement made by a veteran at a board hearing qualifies as an effec… Read More
July 12th, 2018
Contributor: Chris ("Chrys") Attig
Read More
Categories: Veterans Law Updates
Tags: 38 C.F.R. §20.204, Alexander O. Canizares, Circuit Judge Haldane Robert Mayer, Circuit Judge Kathleen O'Malley, Circuit Judge Richard G. Taranto, DeLisio v. Shinseki 25 Vet. App. 45 (2011), Disabled American Veterans (DAV), Fla. Power & Light Co. v. Lorion 470 U.S. 729 (1985), Joshua L. Wolinsky, Judge Alan G. Lance Sr., Louisville KY VARO, McDermott Will & Emery LLP, Milo H. Hawley, Natalie A. Bennett, withdraw an appeal

Recent Cases

Client Win: CAVC No. 21-4029 (BVA fails to consider earlier effective date under §3.156(c).)
This case involves the BVA’s failure to address an argument explicitly raised before it: whether a veteran is entitled to an earlier effective date under 38 C.F.R. 3.156(c) when service medical records are added to the file after the original c… Read More
Client Win: CAVC No. 21-2655, (BVA overlooked evidence of suicidal ideation in claim for an increased PTSD rating)
This case involves the BVA judge’s inadequate reasoning of a denial of a veteran’s claim for an increased rating for PTSD. The appeal was resolved through a joint motion to remand. ISSUE ON APPEAL TO THE CAVC (BVA overlooked evidence of s… Read More
Client Win: CAVC No. 21-0394, (BVA erred in denying past-due benefits in claim for an increased rating)
This case involves the BVA judge’s inadequate reasoning of his denial of a veteran’s past-due benefits in a claim for an increased rating due to an increase in the severity of the veteran’s PTSD. The appeal was resolved through a jo… Read More

See More Appellate Results

Connect With Us:

© 2025 Attig Steel, PLLC
View Our Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
Law Firm Website Design by The Modern Firm

Copyright © 2025 Attig Steel, PLLC