Caring. Effective. Efficient.

BVA Erred in Denying Service Connection for Sleep Apnea

BVA Erred in Denying Service Connection for Sleep Apnea

The BVA denied a veteran service connection for  sleep apnea, and made several errors in doing so.

First, it failed to consider the nexus between the veteran's deviated septum treatment in service and his sleep apnea.

Second, the BVA Veterans Law Judge considered, without any explanation, routine lay statements of symptoms of sleep apnea as "not credible". The VA agreed that the BVA judge erred when he rejected  a  veteran's statements describing in-service sleep deprivation and continuity of symptomatology for his sleep apnea as “not credible” on the grounds that service treatment records were silent for such complaints. 

BVA Judges routinely find veterans "not credible" - and their findings rarely have support in the fact or law.  Please contact Attig | Steel if you have a BVA decision which based its denial on an allegation that your veteran client  lacked credibility.

The Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims vacated this BVA decision denying service connection for sleep apnea and remanded it with instructions to follow in readjudicating the case.

Attig | Steel coordinated with the law firm of Gordon & Doner to handle the veteran's remand to the BVA.

Link to the BVA Decision on CAVC Website.

Link to the Joint Motion to Remand the CAVC Website.

Case Details

OGC Attorney: Shereen Marcus

Veteran Representation at CAVC: Chris Attig (link to bio)

Board of Veterans Appeals Veterans Law Judge:Harvey P. Roberts

Regional Office: Los Angeles, California VARO

Vets’ Rep at BVA: Adam G. Werner

Date of BVA Decision: September 12, 2016

Date of CAVC Remand Order: June 15, 2017

Taking Point! Blog

Jun
3
I really can’t take it anymore. I’m sure many like you feel the same way. Every time another child with a military weapon ambushes a school full of children, I am overwhelmed with emotions that have no outlet. I can’t even process… Read More
May
27
  While on our way to the nutcracker audition at the local theatre I asked my 9-year-old daughter how her day went at school. “It was okay.  We had another active shooter drill.  When the drill started, I had to run behind and under my teacher… Read More
May
23
After years of exploring different fields, I’ve found purpose-driven work here, at Attig | Curran | Steel.   There are a lot of variables in the experience of “happy.” It is difficult to keep it continuous.  Do I feel happy when my kids… Read More
May
18
When appellate courts review the decisions of lower courts – or in administrative law where a Court like the US Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) reviews the decisions of the BVA, an administrative tribunal – they use “… Read More

Read the "Taking Point!" Blog

Recent Cases

This case involves the BVA judge’s inadequate reasoning of a denial of a veteran’s claim for an increased rating for PTSD.   The appeal was resolved through a joint motion to remand. ISSUE ON APPEAL TO THE CAVC (BVA overlooked evidence… Read More
This case involves the BVA judge’s inadequate reasoning of his denial of a veteran’s past-due benefits in a claim for an increased rating due to an increase in the severity of the veteran’s PTSD. The appeal was resolved through a jo… Read More
This case involves the BVA’s failure to comply with a Veterans Court Order in a January 2020 Memorandum Decision. The appeal was resolved through a joint motion to remand. ISSUE ON APPEAL TO THE CAVC (BVA fails to comply with Veterans Court Ord… Read More

See More Appellate Results