Caring. Effective. Efficient.

Client Win: 19-5619, Fernandez v. Wilkie (PTSD rating higher than 50-percent)

Client Win: 19-5619, Fernandez v. Wilkie (PTSD rating higher than 50-percent)

ISSUE ON APPEAL TO THE CAVC: PTSD rating higher than 50-percent.

The veteran appealed to the Board of Veterans Appeals (BVA) seeking a PTSD rating higher than 50-percent. The VA had performed a VA C&P examination and opinion in January 2019. Relying on that exam, the BVA found that the veteran was not entitled to a rating higher than 50% for his PTSD.

In its decision finding that the veteran was not entitled to a PTSD rating higher than 50-percent, the BVA focused on a couple categories of symptoms: family relationships, employment and treatment. The BVA noted the veteran's relationships with his children, ex-spouse, parents and his fear of crowds. The BVA surveyed the veteran's sporadic part-time work history (15-30 hours a week from 2015 - present). And the BVA considered that the veteran declined specialty mental health treatment and could get his prescriptions filled by his primary care provider.

Considering all of these factors, the BVA suggested that the veteran demonstrated occupational and social impairment in some but not most areas. The BVA noted that the veteran had not shown the  inability to maintain relationships envisioned by the higher 70-percent mental health rating. As such, the BVA declined to award a PTSD rating higher than 50-percent.


The veteran was represented in his CAVC appeal of the denial of a PTSD rating higher than 50-percent by attorney Alexandra Curran. 

Ms. Curran argued that the BVA's analysis declining a PTSD rating higher than 50-percent, failed to consider the opinion of a July 2014 VA examiner who determined that Appellant’s “symptoms impair his functioning and productivity at all levels of functioning." And, in discussing the veteran's symptoms of social and occupational impairment, the BVA failed to consider the frequency, duration and severity of those symptoms. 

Additionally, Ms. Curran noted that the veteran had asked for a BVA hearing, but the BVA failed to honor that request.

The VA Secretary, through his attorneys at the Office of General Counsel (OGC), agreed with attorney Alexandra  the BVA erred on the grounds she asserted, above. Accordingly, the Court vacated the BVA decision and remanded the appeal for an assessment of whether the veteran is entitled to a PTSD rating higher than 50-percent.

If this sounds like your case, and the VA or BVA low-balled your PTSD rating, click here to have  Attig | Steel take a look at your case.

Case Details

OGC Attorney: Melissa A. Timbers (Link to attorney profile on OpenPayroll)

Veteran Representation at CAVC: Alexandra Curran (link to bio)

Board of Veterans Appeals Veterans Law Judge:  Matthew W. Blackwelder (link to BVA attorney bio at

Vets’ Rep at BVA: Matthew D. Hill, Attorney (link to bio at Hill & Ponton website)

Date of BVA Decision: May 1, 2019

Date of CAVC Joint Motion to Remand:   April 10, 2020

Link to BVA Decision

Link to Joint Motion to Remand


Recent Cases

This case involves the special, and very powerful, Nehmer effective date rules.  Mr. Greene, the veteran, sought an effective date for his service connected coronary artery disease. He argued his effective date should go back to 2006, the first clai… Read More
This case involves the BVA’s rejection of a theory of service connection by aggravation for a back condition. The BVA refused to service connect the veteran’s back injury, which he argued was aggravated by service-connected knee and hip i… Read More
  This case involves a veteran who served in the Air Force from 1953 to 1957. During service, he injured his back on a flight line, and has repeatedly tried to service connect the injury since leaving service in 1957. Each time, the claim was de… Read More

See More Appellate Results

Taking Point! Blog

Even as protestors march across bridges across the nation, from the Brooklyn Bridge to the Golden Gate, history teaches us that America is resistant to acknowledging the persistent racism that plagues this country and even worse, resistant to do… Read More
“I am a Black man who jogs” was written by Augustus Turner, Mr. Turner retains all copyright to the image and content; it is republished here with his permission. Augustus Turner is a husband, a father, a soldier, and an attorney.… Read More
Earlier this year, I tested an idea – what if a group of lawyers grabbed a virtual cup of coffee every Monday morning and chatted about their progress building a profitable law firm that prioritizes the attorney’s well being? Thos… Read More
If you hear the phrase, lawyers with a purpose, what is your immediate reaction? Do you roll your eyes? Yawn? Close this page and find something else to read? I’ll be honest, the first time a business coach told me that my law practice… Read More

Read the "Taking Point!" Blog