Caring. Effective. Efficient.

BVA errs in relying on 7 year old IBS exam

BVA errs in relying on 7 year old IBS exam

This case had multiple errors in it.  One of the major errors was the BVA treatment of the client's Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS).

The Veteran initially had an exam in 2009 to rate his service-connectedIrritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS).  By the time this appeal found its way to the BVA Veterans Law Judge's desk for a decision, 7 years had passed (the BVAdecision was issued in February 2016).

The question became whether a 7 year old medical exam rating Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) was relevant to rating the veteran in 2016.

Typically, the VA OGC does not like to remand BVA decisions that rely on exams - no matter how old - unless the veteran alleges a worsening of symptoms, in this case, worsening of his Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS).

They frequently rely on a particular case to find that the mere passage of time does not justify a new exam.  Palczewski v. Nicholson, 21 Vet.App. 174, 182-83 (2007).  However, when a veteran tells the VA and BVA that his condition is worsening, that old exam suddenly needs updating.

The Palczewski  decision  is ripe for a challenge, Attig | Steel would be willing to review your BVA decision, if you have an appealable BVA decision in which the BVA relied on a 3-5+ year old exam to rate your condition . 

In this case, the Veteran's VA treatment records for Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) show had several worsening symptoms (including  diarrhea and constipation) multiple times per week. He stated his Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) symptoms were “frequent, persistent, and a major source of agony . . . [that] affects his daily living.”  

On this, and other errors, we were able to secure a remand which vacated the BVA decision and sent it back to the BVA and/or Houston VA Regional Office for a new C&P rating exam for the veteran's Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS).

Does this case sound like your VA Rating Decision or BVA Decision? If so, click here to have  Attig | Steel take a look at your case.

Link to the BVA Decision on CAVC Website.

Link to the Joint Motion to Remand the CAVC Website.

Case Details

OGC Attorney: Abigail J. Schopick

Veteran Representation at CAVC: Chris Attig (link to bio)

Board of Veterans Appeals Veterans Law Judge: J. Parker

Regional Office: Houston, Texas VARO

Vets’ Rep at BVA:  DAV

Date of BVA Decision: February 18, 2016

Date of CAVC Judgment on Remand: December 13, 2016

Taking Point! Blog

Oct
26
If you are an agent, VSO, or attorney, you have a tough decision under AMA when the BVA issues a denial of your client’s benefits. On one hand, you can file a supplemental claim. On the other, you can file an appeal to the US Court of Ap… Read More
Jun
3
I really can’t take it anymore. I’m sure many like you feel the same way. Every time another child with a military weapon ambushes a school full of children, I am overwhelmed with emotions that have no outlet. I can’t even process… Read More
May
27
  While on our way to the nutcracker audition at the local theatre I asked my 9-year-old daughter how her day went at school. “It was okay.  We had another active shooter drill.  When the drill started, I had to run behind and under my teacher… Read More
May
23
After years of exploring different fields, I’ve found purpose-driven work here, at Attig | Curran | Steel.   There are a lot of variables in the experience of “happy.” It is difficult to keep it continuous.  Do I feel happy when my kids… Read More

Read the "Taking Point!" Blog

Recent Cases

This case involves the BVA judge’s inadequate reasoning of a denial of a veteran’s claim for an increased rating for PTSD.   The appeal was resolved through a joint motion to remand. ISSUE ON APPEAL TO THE CAVC (BVA overlooked evidence… Read More
This case involves the BVA judge’s inadequate reasoning of his denial of a veteran’s past-due benefits in a claim for an increased rating due to an increase in the severity of the veteran’s PTSD. The appeal was resolved through a jo… Read More
This case involves the BVA’s failure to comply with a Veterans Court Order in a January 2020 Memorandum Decision. The appeal was resolved through a joint motion to remand. ISSUE ON APPEAL TO THE CAVC (BVA fails to comply with Veterans Court Ord… Read More

See More Appellate Results