Caring. Effective. Efficient.

Client Win: CAVC No. 20-5053, Armstead v. McDonough (BVA must provide fair process in Dependency Indemnity Compensation appeal))

Client Win: CAVC No. 20-5053, Armstead v. McDonough (BVA must provide fair process in Dependency Indemnity Compensation appeal))

This case involves a survivor's claim for entitlement to Dependency and Indemnity Compensation (DIC). The appellant's late-husband served in the US Air Force from 1964 - 1984, and passed away from a rare form of non-Hodgkins lymphoma.

His wife, the appellant, sought service connection of the cause of death based on the veteran's alleged exposure to Agent Orange while serving in Guam and/or at a Royal Thai Air Force Base (RTAFB) in Thailand during the Vietnam war

The appeal was resolved through a joint motion to remand.

ISSUE ON APPEAL TO THE CAVC (BVA must provide fair process in Dependency Indemnity Compensation appeal)

While on remand from the BVA, the VA issued a Supplemental Statement of Case (SSOC) continuing its denial of DIC to the late-veteran's spouse.

She asked the BVA to keep the record open for 90-days for her to submit additional evidence in support of her appeal. There was no dispute that the VA received the request on April 9, 2019. On April 10, 2019, the BVA denied the DIC appeal without discussing the request to keep the record open. 

RESOLUTION AT THE CAVC.

The Court found that principles of fair process prohibit the BVA from issuing an adverse decision until it either receives evidence or argument or until the time requested by an appellant or the time provided by the Board of Veterans Appeals to submit additional evidence or argument has passed. Bryant v. Wilkie, 33 Vet. App. 43 (2020).

The VA's Office of General Counsel agreed that the BVA erred and should have addressed whether the request to keep the record open was received prior to the BVA decision and, if so, provide fair process to the appellant

If you have a DIC or accrued benefits claim pending before the VA or BVA, or if the BVA has ignored your request to keep the record open in any kind of veteran or survivor benefits appeal, and would like help appealing to the CAVC, click here to have  Attig | Curran | Steel take a look at your case.

Case Details

OGC Attorney: Katelyn Lancto (link to attorney's bio on LinkedIn)

Veteran Representation at CAVC: Alexandra Curran (link to bio)

Board of Veterans Appeals Veterans Law Judge:  B.T. Knope (link to judge's bio on LinkedIn)

Attorney for the Board of Veterans Appeals: M. Pryce (attorney bio not available)

Vets’ Rep at BVA: Stacey Clark, Attorney (Morgan & Morgan) (attorney bio on firm's website)

Date of BVA Decision: April 10, 2019

Date of CAVC Joint Motion to Remand: February 3, 2021   

Link to BVA Decision

Link to CAVC Joint Motion for Remand

 

Recent Cases

This case involves an Army veteran who served on active duty in 1991 and then from 2008 to 2009 who was seeking a service-connected major depressive disorder rating in excess of 30%. The appeal was resolved through a joint motion to remand. ISSUE ON… Read More
This case involves a survivor’s claim for entitlement to Dependency and Indemnity Compensation (DIC). The appellant’s late-husband served in the US Air Force from 1964 – 1984, and passed away from a rare form of non-Hodgkins lymphom… Read More
This case involved a US Army veteran (1967 to 1971) who was seeking service connection for hypertension, congestive heart failure, Type II diabetes, stroke, and atrial fibrillation due to agent orange exposure in Thailand during the Vietnam war. The… Read More

See More Appellate Results

Taking Point! Blog

Mar
2
In January 2021, the loss of use of a reproductive organ for SMC purposes was the focus of a panel of judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals Veterans Claims issued a precedential opinion in Bria v. Wilkie.   The panel consisted of Judge Mere… Read More
Feb
26
In January 2021, the VA rating for prostate cancer was the focus of a panel of judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals Veterans Claims issued a precedential opinion in Bailey v. Wilkie.   The panel consisted of Chief Judge Bartley (who… Read More
Feb
26
  Bold and unapologetically honest, Pam Keith is a refreshing political voice you need to follow right now.  She smoothly articulates the most rocky and controversial topics of our time.  It is no surprise that this attorney with 25 years of expe… Read More
Feb
12
In November 2020, a panel of judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals Veterans Claims issued a precedential opinion in Holmes v. Wilkie.   In it, the Court laid out a road map for Veterans trying to get the correct VA rating for migraines… Read More

Read the "Taking Point!" Blog