Caring. Effective. Efficient.

Client Win: CAVC No. 20-4774, Scott v. McDonough (BVA ignores evidence of total occupational and social impairment)

Client Win: CAVC No. 20-4774, Scott v. McDonough  (BVA ignores evidence of total occupational and social impairment)

This case involves involves an Air Force veteran (2000, 2003 - 2004) and his appeal to the BVA seeking a rating above 50% for his service-connected PTSD due to suicidal ideation and total occupational and social impairment. The appeal was resolved through a joint motion to remand.

ISSUE ON APPEAL TO THE CAVC (BVA ignores evidence of total occupational and social impairment)

The Board of Veterans Appeals must include a written statement of the Board’s findings and conclusions, and the reasons or bases for those findings and conclusions, on all material issues of fact and law presented on the record. 38 U.S.C. § 7401(d)(1).

The BVA also has a duty to analyze the probative value of evidence, account for that which it finds persuasive or unpersuasive, and explain the basis for its rejection of evidence materially favorable to the claimant. Caluza v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 498, 506 (1995).

In this case, the issue was whether the BVA erred when it awarded only a 50-percent rating for PTSD without discussing favorable evidence of total occupational and social impairment due to the veteran's PTSD.

RESOLUTION AT THE CAVC.

In February of 2018, the veteran’s private psychologist concluded that the veteran had total occupational and social impairment. The Board failed to address this opinion, as well as lay statements from the veteran’s mother and ex-wife.

The Board also noted that the veteran has shown suicidal ideation. However, there was evidence that indicated the veteran experienced suicidal ideation in recent years. The Board did not reconcile its 50% rating with the veteran’s statements that he continued to experience these thoughts in the present day.

Total occupational and social impairment is a factor related to a 100% rating for PTSD. Suicidal ideation is a symptom that is emblematic of a 70-percent rating.

The VA Office of General Counsel attorney agreed that the Board erred when it failed to provide an adequate statement of reasons or bases for its decision awarding only a 50% rating for PTSD.

If you believe that the VA has issued a ratings decision that does not properly rate your service-connected PTSD, or a  BVA decision denying you service connection or a proper VA PTSD rating, and would like help appealing to the BVA or the CAVC, click here to have  Attig | Curran | Steel take a look at your case.

Case Details

OGC Attorney: Lishayne King (link to attorney's bio on OpenGovNY.com)

Veteran Representation at CAVC: Alexandra Curran (link to bio)

Board of Veterans Appeals Veterans Law Judge:  L. Howell (link to our firm's cases involving Judge Howell's decisions)

Attorney for the VA at the Board: T. Kokolas 

Vets’ Rep at BVA:  Brian D. Hill, Attorney (link to attorney's bio on Hill and Ponton website)

Date of BVA Decision: March 16, 2020

Date of CAVC Joint Motion to Remand: February 8, 2021   

Link to BVA Decision

Link to CAVC Joint Motion to Remand

 

Taking Point! Blog

Jun
3
I really can’t take it anymore. I’m sure many like you feel the same way. Every time another child with a military weapon ambushes a school full of children, I am overwhelmed with emotions that have no outlet. I can’t even process… Read More
May
27
  While on our way to the nutcracker audition at the local theatre I asked my 9-year-old daughter how her day went at school. “It was okay.  We had another active shooter drill.  When the drill started, I had to run behind and under my teacher… Read More
May
23
After years of exploring different fields, I’ve found purpose-driven work here, at Attig | Curran | Steel.   There are a lot of variables in the experience of “happy.” It is difficult to keep it continuous.  Do I feel happy when my kids… Read More
May
18
When appellate courts review the decisions of lower courts – or in administrative law where a Court like the US Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) reviews the decisions of the BVA, an administrative tribunal – they use “… Read More

Read the "Taking Point!" Blog

Recent Cases

This case involves the BVA judge’s inadequate reasoning of a denial of a veteran’s claim for an increased rating for PTSD.   The appeal was resolved through a joint motion to remand. ISSUE ON APPEAL TO THE CAVC (BVA overlooked evidence… Read More
This case involves the BVA judge’s inadequate reasoning of his denial of a veteran’s past-due benefits in a claim for an increased rating due to an increase in the severity of the veteran’s PTSD. The appeal was resolved through a jo… Read More
This case involves the BVA’s failure to comply with a Veterans Court Order in a January 2020 Memorandum Decision. The appeal was resolved through a joint motion to remand. ISSUE ON APPEAL TO THE CAVC (BVA fails to comply with Veterans Court Ord… Read More

See More Appellate Results