Caring. Effective. Efficient.

Client Win: CAVC No. 20-834, Braun v. McDonough (BVA denied TDIU rating due to PTSD)

Client Win: CAVC No. 20-834, Braun v. McDonough (BVA denied TDIU rating due to PTSD)

This case involves a Marine veteran (1985 to 1991) who sought a TDIU 100 percent rating for his service-connected PTSD.

The appeal to the CAVC was resolved through a joint motion to remand. 

ISSUE ON APPEAL TO THE CAVC (BVA denied TDIU rating due to PTSD).

The BVA is required to provide, in every TDIU appeal, a statement of adequate reasons and bases for its conclusion that a veteran is not entitled to TDIU. 38 U.S.C. §7104(d). TDIU is a 100 percent rating given to veterans who are unable to get and keep substantially gainful activity due to their service-connected disabilities. 38 C.F.R. §4.16.  

A TDIU rating is part and parcel of any appeal for the maximum PTSD rating when there is cogent evidence of unemployability in, or reasonably raised by, the record.

In this case, the BVA denied the veteran a TDIU rating for his service connected PTSD

RESOLUTION AT THE CAVC.

The parties agreed that the BVA erred and joined in a motion to vacate the BVA decision and remand it to the BVA for readjudication.

The BVA erred in two ways in this appeal.

First, the BVA's analysis as to why the veteran was not entitled to a TDIU rating due to service connected PTSD was limited to a single sentence, and contained no explanation of its reasoning for concluding that the veteran's PTSD did not prevent him from getting and keeping substantially gainful employment.

Second, the BVA erred when it relied on and adopted the findings of the VA C&P examiner's  report without providing its own analysis. The BVA often forgets that it is the BVA's job to make legal and factual determinations, and the C&P examiner's job to provide only a medical opinion. The BVA always has to weigh evidence for and against the claim.

If you have been denied a TDIU rating due to your service-connected PTSD - or any service connected condition or conditions, and would like help appealing to the BVA or to the CAVC, click here to have  Attig | Curran | Steel take a look at your case.

Case Details

OGC Attorney: Nathan Kirschner (link to attorney's bio on LinkedIn)

Veteran Representation at CAVC: Alexandra Curran  (link to bio)

Board of Veterans Appeals Veterans Law Judge:  Paul Sorisio (link to bio on FederalPay.org)

Attorney for the BVA: K. Cruz

Vets’ Rep at BVA: Stacey Clark, Attorney (Morgan & Morgan) (link to attorney's bio)

Date of BVA Decision: June 21, 2019

Date of CAVC Joint Motion to Remand: February 11, 2021

Link to BVA Decision

Link to CAVC Joint Motion to Remand

 

Recent Cases

This case involves an Army veteran who served on active duty in 1991 and then from 2008 to 2009 who was seeking a service-connected major depressive disorder rating in excess of 30%. The appeal was resolved through a joint motion to remand. ISSUE ON… Read More
This case involves a survivor’s claim for entitlement to Dependency and Indemnity Compensation (DIC). The appellant’s late-husband served in the US Air Force from 1964 – 1984, and passed away from a rare form of non-Hodgkins lymphom… Read More
This case involved a US Army veteran (1967 to 1971) who was seeking service connection for hypertension, congestive heart failure, Type II diabetes, stroke, and atrial fibrillation due to agent orange exposure in Thailand during the Vietnam war. The… Read More

See More Appellate Results

Taking Point! Blog

Mar
2
In January 2021, the loss of use of a reproductive organ for SMC purposes was the focus of a panel of judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals Veterans Claims issued a precedential opinion in Bria v. Wilkie.   The panel consisted of Judge Mere… Read More
Feb
26
In January 2021, the VA rating for prostate cancer was the focus of a panel of judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals Veterans Claims issued a precedential opinion in Bailey v. Wilkie.   The panel consisted of Chief Judge Bartley (who… Read More
Feb
26
  Bold and unapologetically honest, Pam Keith is a refreshing political voice you need to follow right now.  She smoothly articulates the most rocky and controversial topics of our time.  It is no surprise that this attorney with 25 years of expe… Read More
Feb
12
In November 2020, a panel of judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals Veterans Claims issued a precedential opinion in Holmes v. Wilkie.   In it, the Court laid out a road map for Veterans trying to get the correct VA rating for migraines… Read More

Read the "Taking Point!" Blog