Caring. Effective. Efficient.

BVA fails to consider Survivor's Claim of Substitution

BVA fails to consider Survivor's Claim of Substitution

This case involves a survivor's claim of substitution into a veteran's pending claims and appeals when the veteran passes away.

At the time the BVA Veterans Law Judge issued the decision, the law required that a VA Form 21-534 for Survivor benefits will be accepted as both a claim for accrued benefits and a VA claim of substitution form.  38 C.F.R. 3.1010. Additionally, before the BVA issued its decision in this case, the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims issued a precedential decision finding that a VA claim for accrued benefits was also a survivor's VA claim of substitution. Reliford v. McDonald, 27 Vet.App. 297 (2015).  

The BVA ignored the law and failed to consider the survivors VA claim of substitution into pending claims and appeals.

Because the law was so clear, the VA Office of General Counsel agreed to jointly move to vacate the BVA decision for its failure to follow the law and failure to consider whether the surviving spouse's application for VA survivor benefits was also a VA claim of substitution into the veteran's pending claims and appeals.

Does this case sound like your VA Rating Decision or BVA Decision? If so, click here to have  Attig | Steel take a look at your case.

Link to the BVA Decision on CAVC Website.

Link to the Joint Motion to Remand the CAVC Website.

Case Details

OGC Attorney: Yvette R. White

Veteran Representation at CAVC: Chris Attig (link to bio)

Board of Veterans Appeals Veterans Law Judge: Barbara B. Copeland

Regional Office: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, VA Regional Office

Vets’ Rep at BVA: Chris Attig (link to BVA Appeals information)

Date of BVA Decision: March 25, 2015

Date of CAVC Judgment on Remand: November 25, 2015

Recent Cases

This case involves an Army veteran who served on active duty in 1991 and then from 2008 to 2009 who was seeking a service-connected major depressive disorder rating in excess of 30%. The appeal was resolved through a joint motion to remand. ISSUE ON… Read More
This case involves a survivor’s claim for entitlement to Dependency and Indemnity Compensation (DIC). The appellant’s late-husband served in the US Air Force from 1964 – 1984, and passed away from a rare form of non-Hodgkins lymphom… Read More
This case involved a US Army veteran (1967 to 1971) who was seeking service connection for hypertension, congestive heart failure, Type II diabetes, stroke, and atrial fibrillation due to agent orange exposure in Thailand during the Vietnam war. The… Read More

See More Appellate Results

Taking Point! Blog

Mar
2
In January 2021, the loss of use of a reproductive organ for SMC purposes was the focus of a panel of judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals Veterans Claims issued a precedential opinion in Bria v. Wilkie.   The panel consisted of Judge Mere… Read More
Feb
26
In January 2021, the VA rating for prostate cancer was the focus of a panel of judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals Veterans Claims issued a precedential opinion in Bailey v. Wilkie.   The panel consisted of Chief Judge Bartley (who… Read More
Feb
26
  Bold and unapologetically honest, Pam Keith is a refreshing political voice you need to follow right now.  She smoothly articulates the most rocky and controversial topics of our time.  It is no surprise that this attorney with 25 years of expe… Read More
Feb
12
In November 2020, a panel of judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals Veterans Claims issued a precedential opinion in Holmes v. Wilkie.   In it, the Court laid out a road map for Veterans trying to get the correct VA rating for migraines… Read More

Read the "Taking Point!" Blog