Caring. Effective. Efficient.

BVA erred by not addressing secondary service connection based on aggravation

BVA erred by not addressing secondary service connection based on aggravation

This case involved a veteran's entitlement to secondary service connection, on an aggravation theory, for degenerative disc disease of the lumbar spine. 

The BVA is required to provide a written statement of the reasons or bases for its findings and conclusions on all material issues of fact and law presented on the record; that statement must be adequate to enable a veteran to understand the precise basis for the BVA's decision, as well as to facilitate review in the CAVC. 38 U.S.C. § 7104(d)(1).

The BVA denied secondary service connection on an aggravation theory when it wrote  that the veteran had “acute and transitory back pain in service, and that his current back pain is not causally related to, or aggravated by, active service.”

The BVA failed to discuss, or even mention, the secondary service connection aggravation evidence, which showed the veteran had an abnormal spine examination with flattening of the lumbar spine on his entrance examination and at his Air Controlman Candidate examination. The BVA  clearly failed to provide analysis regarding the issue of secondary service connection based on aggravation.

Moreover, the BVA found a VA C&P Examiner opinion and addendum to be the most probative opinions of record, even though the examiner failed to provide any opinion regarding the issue of secondary service connection based on aggravation in either his opinion or  addendum opinion. The BVA was required, on remand, to consider the adequacy of the exam.

Does this case sound like your VA Rating Decision or BVA Decision? If so, click here to have  Attig | Steel take a look at your case.

Link to the BVA Decision on CAVC Website.

Link to the Joint Motion to Remand the CAVC Website.

Case Details

OGC Attorney: Laura A. Bernasconi

Veteran Representation at CAVC: Chris Attig (link to bio)

Board of Veterans Appeals Veterans Law Judge: Michael Martin

Regional Office: Houston, Texas, VA Regional Office

Vets’ Rep at BVA: Texas Veterans Commission (TVC)

Date of BVA Decision: January 28, 2015

Date of CAVC Judgment on Remand: June 16, 2016

Taking Point! Blog

Oct
26
If you are an agent, VSO, or attorney, you have a tough decision under AMA when the BVA issues a denial of your client’s benefits. On one hand, you can file a supplemental claim. On the other, you can file an appeal to the US Court of Ap… Read More
Jun
3
I really can’t take it anymore. I’m sure many like you feel the same way. Every time another child with a military weapon ambushes a school full of children, I am overwhelmed with emotions that have no outlet. I can’t even process… Read More
May
27
  While on our way to the nutcracker audition at the local theatre I asked my 9-year-old daughter how her day went at school. “It was okay.  We had another active shooter drill.  When the drill started, I had to run behind and under my teacher… Read More
May
23
After years of exploring different fields, I’ve found purpose-driven work here, at Attig | Curran | Steel.   There are a lot of variables in the experience of “happy.” It is difficult to keep it continuous.  Do I feel happy when my kids… Read More

Read the "Taking Point!" Blog

Recent Cases

This case involves the BVA judge’s inadequate reasoning of a denial of a veteran’s claim for an increased rating for PTSD.   The appeal was resolved through a joint motion to remand. ISSUE ON APPEAL TO THE CAVC (BVA overlooked evidence… Read More
This case involves the BVA judge’s inadequate reasoning of his denial of a veteran’s past-due benefits in a claim for an increased rating due to an increase in the severity of the veteran’s PTSD. The appeal was resolved through a jo… Read More
This case involves the BVA’s failure to comply with a Veterans Court Order in a January 2020 Memorandum Decision. The appeal was resolved through a joint motion to remand. ISSUE ON APPEAL TO THE CAVC (BVA fails to comply with Veterans Court Ord… Read More

See More Appellate Results