Caring. Effective. Efficient.

Agent Orange exposure in Thailand during Vietnam War

Agent Orange exposure in Thailand during Vietnam War

This case involves a BVA decision that an Army veteran's MOS as a light infantryman did not support his claim of exposure to an herbicide agent while at Korat Royal Thai Air Force Base (RTAFB) in mid 1962. In the same decision, the BVA failed to consider whether an Army veteran who provided RTAFB security before the bases were fully operational in assessing whether the veteran had been exposed to an herbicide (like Agent Orange). 

The appeal was resolved through a joint motion to remand after attorney Alexandra Curran filed her brief on appeal.

ISSUE ON APPEAL TO THE CAVC: Exposure to herbicides on Royal Thai Air Force Base during Vietnam War.

The VA must concede exposure to herbicides when a veteran provides evidence showing he served "on or near" a Royal Thai Air Force Base perimeter during the Vietnam war.

Mr. Jones, an Army veteran stationed in Thailand and Laos in 1962, submitted evidence establishing routine contact with the base perimeter, sleeping in the spray drift zone, and passing through the perimeter of the Royal Thai Air Force Base.

Did the BVA err when it found that Mr. Jones service as an Army infantryman did not support his claim for exposure to herbicide agents at a Royal Thai Air Force Base?

RESOLUTION AT THE CAVC.

Attorney Alexandra Curran proposed the parties enter into a Joint Motion to Remand prior to the filing of briefs. The Secretary chose to defend the BVA's decision.

After Ms. Curran filed her opening brief, the Secretary changed his mind and agreed to a joint motion to remand.

The Secretary agreed that the BVA erred when it failed to comply with its own procedures from the Manual M-21 and failed to adequately reason its denial of the appellant's claim he was exposed to herbicide agents while serving at a Royal Thai Air Force Base (RTAFB) during the Vietnam war.. 

If you believe you were exposed to agent orange during the Vietnam war while serving on a Royal Thai Air Force Base, or on/near the Korean DMZ, and would like help establishing your entitlement to VA disability compensation for any resulting disabilities,  click here to ask  Attig | Curran | Steel to take a look at your case.

Case Details

OGC Attorney: Lance Steahly (link to attorney's bio on LinkedIn)

Veteran Representation at CAVC: Alexandra Curran (link to bio)

Board of Veterans Appeals Veterans Law Judge:  L. Howell

Vets’ Rep at BVA: The American Legion

Date of BVA Decision: February 14, 2019

Date of CAVC Joint Motion to Remand:   April 3, 2020

Link to BVA Decision

Link to Appellant's Opening Brief

Link to Joint Motion to Remand

 

Taking Point! Blog

Oct
26
If you are an agent, VSO, or attorney, you have a tough decision under AMA when the BVA issues a denial of your client’s benefits. On one hand, you can file a supplemental claim. On the other, you can file an appeal to the US Court of Ap… Read More
Jun
3
I really can’t take it anymore. I’m sure many like you feel the same way. Every time another child with a military weapon ambushes a school full of children, I am overwhelmed with emotions that have no outlet. I can’t even process… Read More
May
27
  While on our way to the nutcracker audition at the local theatre I asked my 9-year-old daughter how her day went at school. “It was okay.  We had another active shooter drill.  When the drill started, I had to run behind and under my teacher… Read More
May
23
After years of exploring different fields, I’ve found purpose-driven work here, at Attig | Curran | Steel.   There are a lot of variables in the experience of “happy.” It is difficult to keep it continuous.  Do I feel happy when my kids… Read More

Read the "Taking Point!" Blog

Recent Cases

This case involves the BVA judge’s inadequate reasoning of a denial of a veteran’s claim for an increased rating for PTSD.   The appeal was resolved through a joint motion to remand. ISSUE ON APPEAL TO THE CAVC (BVA overlooked evidence… Read More
This case involves the BVA judge’s inadequate reasoning of his denial of a veteran’s past-due benefits in a claim for an increased rating due to an increase in the severity of the veteran’s PTSD. The appeal was resolved through a jo… Read More
This case involves the BVA’s failure to comply with a Veterans Court Order in a January 2020 Memorandum Decision. The appeal was resolved through a joint motion to remand. ISSUE ON APPEAL TO THE CAVC (BVA fails to comply with Veterans Court Ord… Read More

See More Appellate Results